Measuring impacts and comparing impact performance data helps companies make strategic and operational decisions for their future survival and resilience, set goals, and communicate performance.
There are several steps to understanding and measuring impacts, including mapping the impact, identifying those you want to monitor, and determining which methodology is the most appropriate depending on the message you want to convey.
That way, companies will see the effects of their vision and strategy so that they can reinforce what is working and change or eliminate what is not.
The impact, defined as a change in a positive or negative outcome for people or the planet, can be measured across five dimensions of performance. Each dimension seeks to answer impact questions.
{{encartSpecial}}
To guide companies in collecting this information, the IMP (Impact Management Project) has broken the five dimensions down into 15 categories of data.
The IMP offers a template on their website to help organizations set up an impact measurement process from scratch. The table can also be used as a checklist for ensuring that existing impact data provides sufficient coverage across the five dimensions to enable robust assessment.
Data to value impacts can be collected through 3 approaches: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Monetary.
Companies will use one or several data approaches in their impact assessment, depending on the level of granularity and confidence targeted.
For better interpretation, impact assessment can require comparison with a counterfactual (expression of what has not happened), that narrows impact down to a measurable change in a pre-specified variable.
For example for social impact, the pre-specified variable would be the result of what would have happened in the absence of one social program, one social investment. Companies can measure how much impact they have had compared to a situation where they would have done nothing.
Mapping impacts permits to identify them in advance. It leads to:
Companies can represent the realm of possibilities of the kinds of impact a business decision, a business strategy, an activity, a good or service production might have or already has. The impacts will be mapped according to several criteria, intended or unintended, positive or negative, foreseen ahead of time, or unforeseen, like in the table below.
Example from a job skills program reduce unemployment among young people in a rural district:
Companies can also map the network of impacts of their activities, their products, their actions have, considering all possible effects of the cause.
Below is an example of a network of impacts for the construction of a dam:
They are different frameworks and valuation methodologies designed to measure and communicate social and environmental impacts. They provide companies with processes related to impact reporting. Below is a short description of these methodologies.
They assist companies in defining the scope of their impact assessments, setting their objectives and delivering meaningful and consistent results. This is the first step for companies in the process of impact reporting.
Examples of impact framework: Theory of Change, Impact Management Project
They are used to further evaluate impact, with the aim of measuring and placing a monetary value on identified impacts. This enables companies to communicate their impacts both internally and externally, and to provide comparisons of the impacts of different projects or investments (thanks to the common monetary unit). It is usually done on a second step, to align the impact strategy with the financial strategy.
Example of valuation methodology: Natural/Social Capital Protocols developed by The World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), Social Return on Investment (SROI) methodology
Want to improve your Impact?
Achieve your sustainability goals with our Sustainability Roadmap feature! We’ll help you easily identify risks and opportunities, prioritise actions, and track progress towards your objectives. Manage your impact and take a leading position in sustainable practices with our tool. Try it today!
Both ESG strategies and impact investing can deliver superior financial performance, but each works in different ways. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) provides a framework for understanding the nuances between ESG and impact investing and comparing actions taken at each stage of the typical investment process in light of these differences.
Impact frameworks are used to define a company's scope of assessment and objectives, while valuation methodologies measure the monetary value of social and environmental impacts. Both provide companies with a process for impact reporting.
Impact, defined as a change in a positive or negative outcome for people or the planet, can be measured across five dimensions of performance. Each dimension seeks to answer impact questions: What, Who, How Much, Contribution and Risk.