Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) gained popularity in recent years, and is used by organizations to help them reduce financial, reputational and operational risks.
The purpose of ESG policy development is to ensure that companies do not harm the environment, society or governance, and to improve their impact. Which, consequently, improves their success in the long run.
However, ESG is changing.
ESG is set to grow rapidly and shape the corporate sustainability agenda. Here are some of the most crucial and recent developments.
New types of rating agencies that focused on non-financial criteria began to develop in the early 2000s.
Rating processes were developed to help investors conduct in-depth analyses of the companies within their portfolios and how well those companies adhered to ESG criteria, and such agencies incorporated a review of a company’s environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance in addition to their economic performance.
These agencies are commonly called social and environmental rating agencies, or, extra-financial rating agencies.
Each extra-financial rating agency has its own evaluation grids and criteria, its own methodology. Just as there is a multiplicity of ESG standards and frameworks (GRI, IIRC, SASB, etc.), there are a number of different extra-financial rating agencies, each with their own process and ESG questionnaires.
Nevertheless, ESG rating processes are trending towards homogenization.
An initial consolidation movement (mergers, acquisitions or alliances) in the 1990s led to the appearance of the currently well-known extra-financial rating agencies operating on an international scope – Vigeo (France), MSCI ESG Research (United States), EIRIS (United Kingdom), oekom research (Germany), Inrate (Switzerland), Solaron (India) and Sustainalytics (Netherlands) – and the 2010s have seen continued consolidation, in a market increasingly dominated by American corporations.
Some of the most significant recent developments in the extra-financial rating ecosystem include:
ESG funds are growing rapidly, indicating huge market demand for application of ESG strategy.
CNBC puts ESG fund inflow at over $21 billion during the first quarter of 2021, an increase from the $51 billion for the entire year of 2020 and $21.4 billion in 2019.
A BlackRock representative attributes this increase in interest for ESG to more visibly impactful methods of incorporating sustainable investments. Financial experts now view ESG as a “core-type strategy”- and this trend looks like it will only continue in the coming decades.
ESG leaders are still struggling to get a hold on the unwieldy world of ESG data, but the standardization of ESG reporting and disclosure is of high priority.
ESG analysts from Forrester suggest that industry regulations will become increasingly specific, detailed, and relevant in coming years. Companies are also reacting to dynamic materiality and the unpredictability of factors like new knowledge, regulations, and global events by adopting and developing new procedures to measure risk.
Shareholder activists are people who use their influence, through ownership of company shares, to enact change within a company and/or in that company’s external impact.
As partial owners of the company whose shares they own, shareholder activists can initiate important conversations with the board of directors and enact change.
Tactics for enacting change vary, especially because there are different classes of shares that allow for a range of voting privileges.
Examples of tactics include: a dialogue with managers, formal proposals, social pressure through social media, and lawsuits.
According to the most recent IPCC climate report, the world has reached an increase of 1.1°C compared with the average in 1850–1900, resulting in extreme weather such as the 2020 Australia wildfires.
In order to achieve the Paris Agreement limit of a 2°C increase by the end of the 21st century, MSCI’s Warming Potential estimates that every company in the MSCI ACWI IMI would have to reduce total carbon intensity (Scopes 1, 2 and 3) by an average of 8%-10% per year from 2021 until 2050.
The need for steep reductions in emissions in portfolios means that companies would have to find means of decarbonizing rapidly, and investors/investment firms are faced with the choices of convincing companies to undergo massive overhaul of procedure, change their portfolio concentration, and/or shift assets.
The need for ESG only seems to be growing as society enters unprecedented times: climate change, protests and social upheaval, increasing technological capabilities, the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
The lack of existing data on the situations that we now face make clear a need for frameworks that can quantify and mitigate unpredictable risks.
ESG strategies can help meet those needs, while providing some guidelines on how to build more resiliency into the corporate universe.
So, what are you waiting for? Start implementing ESG today!
And this is where we can help:
If you want to succeed in your sustainable journey: save time, get organized, and stay compliant with our tool!
Thanks to our AI, apiday provides you with a simple and efficient process for your data collection, verification, reporting, and certification.
Get your organization started and book a call with our ESG experts!
What if you could both save time and improve the efficiency of your ESG strategy?
Our automated reporting tool streamlines ESG reporting and reduces errors, so you can focus on more strategic tasks, and generate comprehensive reports easily. Enhance business competitiveness and productivity, and contribute to a more sustainable future with our solution. Unlock the full potential of your organisation today!